Talk:Attica prefecture - Revision history

Lazarus at 15:03, October 30, 2005

2005-10-30T15:03:01Z

Lazarus at 15:01, October 30, 2005

2005-10-30T15:01:26Z

Irlandos at 14:55, October 30, 2005

2005-10-30T14:55:15Z

Lazarus at 14:34, October 30, 2005

2005-10-30T14:34:13Z

New page

Attica, as a word, appears only in reference with the prefecture (or periphery). Shouldn't then this article be moved under "Attica" as the reference to "Attica prefecture" is redundant?
--[[User:Lazarus|Lazarus]] 09:34, 30 October 2005 (EST)

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 I named all prefectures as such as, otherwise, I would have difficulty remembering which ones I did and which ones I didn't!
-In that case you can simply have a REDIRECT action. You can accomplish by putting a #REDIRECT [[Go Here]] (where "Go here" is the article that you want to go to. When you redirected you will see (Redirected from [[Attica prefecture]]) on the top under [[Attica]]. I went ahead and did it as it makes sense to have Attica as an article, but your argument makes sense also.
+In that case you can simply have a REDIRECT action. You can accomplish by putting a #REDIRECT [ [Go Here] ] (where "Go here" is the article that you want to go to. When you redirected you will see (Redirected from [[Attica prefecture]]) on the top under [[Attica]]. I went ahead and did it as it makes sense to have Attica as an article, but your argument makes sense also.
 --[[User:Lazarus|Lazarus]] 10:01, 30 October 2005 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, October 30, 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I named all prefectures as such as, otherwise, I would have difficulty remembering which ones I did and which ones I didn't!		I named all prefectures as such as, otherwise, I would have difficulty remembering which ones I did and which ones I didn't!
		+
		+	In that case you can simply have a REDIRECT action. You can accomplish by putting a #REDIRECT [[Go Here]] (where "Go here" is the article that you want to go to. When you redirected you will see (Redirected from [[Attica prefecture]]) on the top under [[Attica]]. I went ahead and did it as it makes sense to have Attica as an article, but your argument makes sense also.
		+	--[[User:Lazarus\|Lazarus]] 10:01, 30 October 2005 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:55, October 30, 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Attica, as a word, appears only in reference with the prefecture (or periphery). Shouldn't then this article be moved under "Attica" as the reference to "Attica prefecture" is redundant?		Attica, as a word, appears only in reference with the prefecture (or periphery). Shouldn't then this article be moved under "Attica" as the reference to "Attica prefecture" is redundant?
	--[[User:Lazarus\|Lazarus]] 09:34, 30 October 2005 (EST)		--[[User:Lazarus\|Lazarus]] 09:34, 30 October 2005 (EST)
		+
		+
		+	I named all prefectures as such as, otherwise, I would have difficulty remembering which ones I did and which ones I didn't!