Difference between revisions of "Talk:Attica prefecture"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I named all prefectures as such as, otherwise, I would have difficulty remembering which ones I did and which ones I didn't! | I named all prefectures as such as, otherwise, I would have difficulty remembering which ones I did and which ones I didn't! | ||
| + | |||
| + | In that case you can simply have a REDIRECT action. You can accomplish by putting a #REDIRECT [[Go Here]] (where "Go here" is the article that you want to go to. When you redirected you will see (Redirected from [[Attica prefecture]]) on the top under [[Attica]]. I went ahead and did it as it makes sense to have Attica as an article, but your argument makes sense also. | ||
| + | --[[User:Lazarus|Lazarus]] 10:01, 30 October 2005 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 14:56, October 30, 2005
Attica, as a word, appears only in reference with the prefecture (or periphery). Shouldn't then this article be moved under "Attica" as the reference to "Attica prefecture" is redundant? --Lazarus 09:34, 30 October 2005 (EST)
I named all prefectures as such as, otherwise, I would have difficulty remembering which ones I did and which ones I didn't!
In that case you can simply have a REDIRECT action. You can accomplish by putting a #REDIRECT Go Here (where "Go here" is the article that you want to go to. When you redirected you will see (Redirected from Attica prefecture) on the top under Attica. I went ahead and did it as it makes sense to have Attica as an article, but your argument makes sense also. --Lazarus 10:01, 30 October 2005 (EST)