Difference between revisions of "Talk:Attica prefecture"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Attica, as a word, appears only in reference with the prefecture (or periphery). Shouldn't then this article be moved under "Attica" as the reference to "Attica prefecture" is redundant? | Attica, as a word, appears only in reference with the prefecture (or periphery). Shouldn't then this article be moved under "Attica" as the reference to "Attica prefecture" is redundant? | ||
--[[User:Lazarus|Lazarus]] 09:34, 30 October 2005 (EST) | --[[User:Lazarus|Lazarus]] 09:34, 30 October 2005 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I named all prefectures as such as, otherwise, I would have difficulty remembering which ones I did and which ones I didn't! | ||
Revision as of 14:50, October 30, 2005
Attica, as a word, appears only in reference with the prefecture (or periphery). Shouldn't then this article be moved under "Attica" as the reference to "Attica prefecture" is redundant? --Lazarus 09:34, 30 October 2005 (EST)
I named all prefectures as such as, otherwise, I would have difficulty remembering which ones I did and which ones I didn't!