Difference between revisions of "Talk:Hugh de Champlitte"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[[User:Akrogiali|Akrogiali]] | [[User:Akrogiali|Akrogiali]] | ||
| − | I agree he belongs but how do we categorise him? We like to tie historical subjects together through categories and subcategories. If you look at [[ | + | I agree he belongs but how do we categorise him? We like to tie historical subjects together through categories and subcategories. If you look at [[History of Greece]], you will see what I mean --[[User:Irlandos|Irlandos]] 07:59, February 13, 2009 (EST) |
Revision as of 12:56, February 13, 2009
How can we relate this to Greek history? I propose a new category, something like "Latin Empire", that can be a sub-category in Byzantine Empire. Or, we can have both as subcategories to "Mediaeval Greece", itself a sub-category of Greek history. What sayeth ye? --Irlandos 03:15, February 13, 2009 (EST)
Hugh was involved in the battle of Constantinople, battles around Thessaloniki; 3 battler in Pelopponese, was a "ruler" in Achaia for one year, died in Greece. His and his uncle's descendends still live in Greece and are Greek. He is part of Greek History the same wasy as Ypsilantis and Kolokotronis were. Akrogiali
I agree he belongs but how do we categorise him? We like to tie historical subjects together through categories and subcategories. If you look at History of Greece, you will see what I mean --Irlandos 07:59, February 13, 2009 (EST)